Fog collection

Fog collection is a passive method of capturing liquid water droplets carried by fog, usually with mesh screens exposed to wind. Droplets gather on the mesh and drain into a gutter and storage system. It can supplement water supplies in selected fog-prone locations, but yield depends strongly on local weather and terrain, and collected water requires appropriate quality management.

Last updated
7 November 2026
Confidence
Moderate (80%)
Sources
4
Versions
3
This article was researched and drafted with AI assistance and checked by an automated review pass. It is not guaranteed to be accurate — verify important facts against the references below.

How it works

A typical fog collector places a mesh panel across the path of fog-bearing wind. As air passes through, some suspended droplets strike and adhere to the mesh fibres. Droplets merge into larger drops, which run down the screen under gravity into a gutter and then through pipes to a tank or cistern. The system does not extract invisible water vapour from dry air: it intercepts liquid droplets already present in fog. It is generally passive and needs no pumping energy at the collector itself, although distribution or treatment elsewhere may require energy.

Site selection and performance

Fog collection is most promising where fog occurs frequently and wind carries it across an exposed collection area. Coastal hills and mountain ridges are among the settings where projects have been explored. Mesh material, droplet size, wind speed and direction, collector orientation, terrain, and season all influence how much water is captured. Yields therefore vary greatly from one location and period to another; a pilot collector and local meteorological measurements are useful before planning a larger supply.

Uses and community systems

Collected water can support irrigation and other local uses, and in some projects it supplements domestic water supplies. A complete scheme includes more than the mesh: gutters, conveyance pipes, storage, and arrangements for operating and maintaining the infrastructure are also needed. Projects work best when the scale and expected seasonal supply match community needs and local conditions. They are generally a supplementary, location-specific source rather than a universal replacement for conventional water systems.

Water quality and limitations

The quality of harvested water cannot be assumed from its appearance or origin. Fog droplets may pick up airborne substances, while collection surfaces, pipes, tanks, animals, or handling can introduce contamination. Drinking-water use therefore calls for site-specific testing, suitable treatment where needed, and regular cleaning and inspection of the system. Strong winds can damage structures, and low-fog periods reduce production. Feasibility assessment, durable design, safe overflow and storage, and local maintenance capacity are important to a reliable project.

Key facts

Collection principle
Mesh intercepts liquid fog droplets, which coalesce and drain by gravity.
Main site requirements
Recurring fog, wind to carry it through the collector, and a suitable exposed location.
Energy
Collection at the mesh is passive; downstream treatment or distribution may have separate energy needs.
Water safety
Collected water should be assessed and managed for quality before drinking use.

Ask about this article

Answers use only “Fog collection” and its references, with citations.

References

  1. 1.
    Fog as a Fresh-Water Resource: Overview and Perspectives

    Ambio; available through PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 7 November 2026

  2. 2.
    Fog harvesting

    Climate Technology Centre & Network · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 7 November 2026

  3. 3.
    Women-led Fog Harvesting for a Resilient, Sustainable Ecosystem Morocco

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 7 November 2026

  4. 4.
    CloudFisher – Frequently asked questions

    WasserStiftung · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 7 November 2026

References are suggested by the research engine and may be incomplete. Unverified URLs are omitted rather than guessed.

Article history

  1. Version 37 November 2026 · EditorUpdated by Zapia
  2. Version 27 November 2026 · EditorUpdated by Zapia
  3. Version 17 November 2026 · EditorCreated by Zapia