Hubble tension
The Hubble tension is the persistent difference between estimates of the present-day expansion rate of the universe, the Hubble constant, obtained from observations of the nearby universe and values inferred from observations of the early universe using a cosmological model. Local distance-ladder measurements generally give a higher value than cosmic-microwave-background-based estimates within the standard ΛCDM model. Independent telescope observations have tested measurement uncertainties, but the cause of the discrepancy remains unsettled.
The Hubble constant
The Hubble constant, usually written H₀, describes the present-day proportionality between the distance to a sufficiently distant galaxy and its recession velocity as part of cosmic expansion. It is expressed in kilometres per second per megaparsec. Its value is important for estimating the expansion history and age of the universe, but measurements that use different data and assumptions need not be direct like-for-like observations.
Two broad measurement approaches
A local or late-universe approach builds a cosmic distance ladder. Geometric distances calibrate nearby objects such as Cepheid variable stars; Cepheids then help calibrate Type Ia supernovae in more distant galaxies, whose brightnesses can be compared with their redshifts. Analyses of this kind have found values around 70–76 km/s/Mpc, with the precise result depending on the dataset and method. A second approach measures the cosmic microwave background (CMB), relic radiation from the early universe, and infers H₀ by fitting a cosmological model to those data. Under the base ΛCDM model, the Planck 2018 analysis found H₀ = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc. This inferred value is model-dependent, not a direct measurement of the nearby expansion rate.
Why the disagreement matters
The difference has persisted as the precision of several measurements improved. Webb observations of Cepheids, used alongside Hubble measurements, supported the reliability of the distance-ladder observations and reduced the likelihood that a particular source of Cepheid measurement error fully explains the discrepancy. This does not by itself establish that the explanation must be new physics: uncertainty in data, calibration, analysis choices and cosmological modelling continues to be scrutinized. If robust and not attributable to unrecognized systematics or assumptions, the mismatch could indicate that the standard cosmological model is incomplete.
Possible explanations and open questions
Researchers have investigated possibilities that alter the inferred early-universe expansion or the calibration scale, including additional energy or particle components before recombination, changes in the physics of recombination, and modifications to late-time cosmic expansion. These are proposals under test, not established explanations. Other distance indicators, independent observatories and improved calibration can help distinguish among measurement effects and changes to cosmological theory. The tension is therefore a live research problem rather than a settled discovery of a specific new component of the universe.
Key facts
- Quantity at issue
- The Hubble constant H₀ is the present-day expansion-rate parameter, conventionally expressed in km/s/Mpc.
- Local approach
- Distance-ladder studies use calibrated distance indicators such as Cepheids and Type Ia supernovae to estimate the expansion rate in the relatively nearby universe.
- Early-universe inference
- Planck 2018 reported H₀ = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc when its CMB data were interpreted within base ΛCDM; this is an inference conditional on the model.
- Observed pattern
- Many local distance-ladder estimates are higher than the value inferred from early-universe CMB data under base ΛCDM; exact values vary by analysis.
- Status
- The discrepancy remains unexplained; neither a particular systematic error nor a specific extension of cosmology has been established as its cause.
- Cross-check
- NASA/ESA Webb observations of Cepheids agreed with Hubble observations in a test of the distance ladder's stellar measurements.
Ask about this article
Answers use only “Hubble tension” and its references, with citations.
References
- 1.Hubble Constant and Tension
NASA Science · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 25 October 2026
Supports: Overview of the Hubble constant, distance-ladder and CMB measurement approaches, their differing ranges, and the unresolved status of the tension.
- 2.Webb and Hubble telescopes affirm Universe’s expansion rate, puzzle persists
European Space Agency (ESA/Webb) · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 25 October 2026
Supports: Reports that Webb Cepheid observations agreed with Hubble measurements, while emphasizing that the Hubble tension persists.
- 3.Planck 2018 results - VI. Cosmological parameters
Astronomy & Astrophysics (Planck Collaboration) · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 25 October 2026
Supports: Reports the Planck base-ΛCDM estimate of H₀ = 67.4 ± 0.5 km s−1 Mpc−1 and discusses tension with local measurements.
- 4.The Hubble tension
CERN Courier · other · reliability: unverified · retrieved 25 October 2026
Supports: Explains the distance-ladder and early-universe inference approaches, key differences between them and candidate explanations under investigation.
References are suggested by the research engine and may be incomplete. Unverified URLs are omitted rather than guessed.
Article history
- Version 125 October 2026 · EditorCreated by Zapia